Former Santa Clara Councilman Dominic Caserta has been unveiled on $30,000 bail just after he was charged in January with forgery and falsifying money statements on a loan software, prosecutors reported.
Caserta posted bail after self-surrendering in San Benito County past Tuesday, according to Santa Clara County Supervising Deputy District Lawyer Steven Dal Porto. The warrant for his arrest was issued Feb. 16 and signed by Outstanding Court Judge Paul Bernal.
He is established to be arraigned on Could 13 at the Palo Alto courthouse. Caserta and his attorney, San Jose-dependent criminal defense lawyer Sam Polverino, could not be achieved for remark.
According to court docket documents, the former councilman solid 6 Foothill-De Anza Group College or university paystubs from July 31 to Oct. 31, 2021 in an exertion to obtain a bank loan for $690,000 from Finance of The usa Home loan.
Caserta also submitted a untrue work verification variety for 2021 to the lender exactly where he said the college or university paid him $81,141.89 as a portion-time teacher and solid the signature of a district personnel, authorities said.
He has not labored at Foothill Faculty due to the fact 2019 and is now a political science lecturer at San Francisco State College.
When investigators contacted him in November, they claimed Caserta “denied speaking to anyone from Finance of America and reiterated that he experienced not loaded out any Verification of Work types,” in accordance to court docket documents.
Caserta was elected to the council in 2002 and re-elected once again in 2006 and 2014. Through his 2018 bid for county supervisor, a campaign staffer accused him of generating unwelcome sexual innovations.
Shortly immediately after, a leaked personnel file from the Santa Clara Unified School District showed that pupils had made allegations of sexual harassment versus the large university civics instructor courting back to 2002.
In August 2018, the district attorney’s workplace declined to file fees from Caserta for the alleged sexual misconduct, citing inadequate evidence.